Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move async-signature and signature-derive to toplevel #1391

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2023

Conversation

tarcieri
Copy link
Member

These crates were previously nested under signature/async and signature/derive, which complicates tooling that expects crates to be in toplevel directories, and as things currently stand also meant that releases of the signature crate accidentally included stale copies of the other two crates.

This commit moves them to toplevel async-signature and signature-derive directories.

@tarcieri tarcieri force-pushed the move-signature-crates-to-toplevel branch from b4e2ac0 to fc5caa8 Compare November 12, 2023 14:34
These crates were previously nested under `signature/async` and
`signature/derive`, which complicates tooling that expects crates to be
in toplevel directories, and as things currently stand also meant that
releases of the `signature` crate accidentally included stale copies of
the other two crates.

This commit moves them to toplevel `async-signature` and
`signature-derive` directories.
@tarcieri tarcieri force-pushed the move-signature-crates-to-toplevel branch from fc5caa8 to f24d9da Compare November 12, 2023 14:53
@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 5b2f9cb into master Nov 12, 2023
82 checks passed
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the move-signature-crates-to-toplevel branch November 12, 2023 15:29
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2023
The crate name contains an underscore, not a hyphen, but #1391
accidentally used `signature-derive` instead
tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2023
The crate name contains an underscore, not a hyphen, but #1391
accidentally used `signature-derive` instead
@tarcieri tarcieri mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant